Full House Resorts Stock Performance

FLL Stock  USD 2.61  -0.13  -4.74%   
The firm maintains a market beta of 0.61, which means possible diversification benefits within a given portfolio. As returns on the market increase, Full House's returns are expected to increase less than the market. However, during a bear market, the loss from holding Full House is expected to be smaller as well. At this point, Full House Resorts has a negative expected return of -0.0976%. Please make sure to verify Full House's the relationship between the value at risk and daily balance of power, to decide if Full House Resorts's performance from the past will be repeated at some point in the near future.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Weak
 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days, Full House Resorts generated negative risk-adjusted returns and added little value for investors with long positions. The result matters because weak risk-adjusted return can persist even when isolated price moves briefly look constructive. Despite quite persistent essential indicators, Full House is not utilizing all of its potential. The recent price mess may contribute to short-term losses for institutional investors. Learn More

Actual Historical Performance (%)

 One Day Return
-4.74
 Five Day Return
-0.38
 Year To Date Return
4.4
 Ten Year Return
76.35
 All Time Return
-13.00
Begin Period Cash Flow73.8 M
Total Cashflows From Investing Activities-45.7 M

Relative Risk vs. Return Landscape

If you had invested $ 288.00 in Full House Resorts on December 15, 2025 and sold it today you would have lost $ 27.00 from holding Full House Resorts or given up 9.37% of portfolio value over 90 days. Full House Resorts is generating negative expected returns assuming volatility of 3.5918% on return distribution over 90 days investment horizon. In other words, 32% of stocks are less volatile than Full, and above 99% of all equities are expected to generate higher returns over the next 90 days.
  Expected Return   
       Risk  
This benchmark view frames the instrument through return capture and volatility trade-offs. It is most useful when expected return is read together with volatility rather than in isolation. Considering the 90-day investment horizon Full House is expected to under-perform the market. In addition to that, the company is 4.57 times more volatile than its market benchmark. It trades about -0.03 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. The Dow Jones Industrial is currently generating roughly -0.08 per unit of volatility.

Target Price Odds to finish over Current Price

The mean-reverting behavior of Full Stock price is a cornerstone of quantitative forecasting. While this pattern has been used by investors since the earliest organized markets, research also shows that certain stocks remain mispriced until demand-supply dynamics shift, suggesting embedded risk premiums.
Current PriceHorizonTarget PriceOdds moving above the current price in 90 days
2.61 90 days 2.61
about 34.78
Probability analysis for this stock suggests that the odds of Full House moving above the current price in 90 days from now are about 34.78 (This density function estimates how Full Stock price is distributed across a range of outcomes over the next 90 days).
Considering the 90-day investment horizon Full House has a beta of 0.61. This usually indicates as returns on the market go up, Full House's average returns are expected to increase less than the benchmark. However, during a bear market, the loss from holding Full House Resorts is expected to be smaller as well. Additionally, Full House Resorts has an alpha of 0.0394, implying that it can generate a 0.0394 percent excess return over Dow Jones Industrial after adjusting for the inherent market risk (beta).
   Full House Price Density   
       Price  

Predictive Modules for Full House

For Full House Resorts, multiple forecasting techniques can provide different perspectives on future price direction. While accurately predicting the stock market remains difficult, the discipline of building and testing forecasts is a valuable part of any investment process. Unexpected events can always change market sentiment, making diversified forecasting approaches especially important.
The mean reversion effect in Full House is stronger when the initial deviation was driven by sentiment rather than fundamental change. Identifying the root cause of Full House's price dislocation is essential before acting.
Hype
Prediction
LowEstimatedHigh
0.132.616.20
Details
Intrinsic
Valuation
LowRealHigh
0.112.195.78
Details
Naive
Forecast
LowNextHigh
0.062.786.37
Details
Analyst
Consensus
LowTargetHigh
3.413.754.16
Details
Competitive positioning is a critical dimension of Full House analysis. Understanding where Full House Resorts stands relative to its peers on returns, growth, and valuation helps investors assess whether its advantage is sustainable.

Primary Risk Indicators

Over recent decades, the stock market has seen multiple large corrections and recoveries. Full House has followed this pattern, with price swings that have shaped many portfolios. Investors holding Full House Resorts can reduce exposure to these swings by tracking Full House's volatility and fundamental risk indicators.
α
Alpha over Dow Jones
0.04
β
Beta against Dow Jones0.61
σ
Overall volatility
0.23
Ir
Information ratio 0.02

Investor Alerts and Insights

Monitoring Full House alerts is a practical approach to staying informed about material stock changes. These notifications for Full House Resorts cover developments in both technical signals and fundamental conditions relevant to investment timing.
Full House Resorts generated a negative expected return over the last 90 days
Full House Resorts has high historical volatility and very poor performance
The company reported last year's revenue of 302.38 M. Reported Net Loss for the year was -40.67 M with profit before taxes, overhead, and interest of 155.14 M.
Latest headline from finance.yahoo.com: Dominos Pizza Group H 2 Earnings Call Highlights

Full House Fundamentals Growth

The market value of Full Stock depends on how investors perceive Full House's financial strength and growth potential. Core fundamentals including revenue growth, earnings quality, and debt management directly influence Full Stock performance.

Performance Metrics & Calculation Methodology

Full House performance is measured on a risk-adjusted basis against benchmarks. Upside capture and downside containment can vary by regime. Full House shows ROE of -101.45%.

Unless otherwise specified, data for Full House Resorts is compiled from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and standardized for comparability. Updates may occur throughout the day. Return and risk statistics are calculated from historical price series.

This content is curated and reviewed by:

Rifka Kats - Member of Macroaxis Editorial Board
Last reviewed on March 6th, 2026